Should there be awards for -worst streaming original-?

The television landscape has been fundamentally changed by the rise of streaming platforms. These platforms have not only revolutionized traditional media ...

but also spawned a wealth of exclusive content. Some of it is undoubtedly better than others-and as with any form of entertainment, the question naturally arises as to whether awards should be given to potentially the worst streaming originals.

---

1. The Rise of Streaming Originals
2. Criticism of Streaming Originals
3. Should There Be Awards for -Worst-
4. Conclusion: Balancing Risk and Reward

---

1.) The Rise of Streaming Originals

Streaming platforms like Netflix, Amazon Prime Video, Hulu, and Disney+ have flooded the market with original content in a bid to distinguish themselves from one another. These originals range from critically acclaimed dramas (e.g., -The Crown,- -Squid Game- to deeply divisive ones (e.g., -Bird Box,- -Euphoria- The variety is impressive, showcasing not only successful franchises like -Stranger Things- and -The Mandalorian- but also a wide array of experimental and niche projects.

---

2.) Criticism of Streaming Originals

With such a vast pool of content comes varying degrees of quality. Critics often find themselves at odds with viewers who seemingly enjoy bad movies or shows, leading to discussions about the appropriateness of awarding -worst- titles. A common argument is that awards should be reserved for exceptional and innovative works rather than mediocrity or outright failures.

---

3.) Should There Be Awards for -Worst-

1. Definition of -Worst-

First, let's clarify what we mean by a -worst streaming original.- This could range from poorly received shows that fail to resonate with audiences (like some entries in the Marvel Cinematic Universe) to intentionally bad productions that critics and viewers find unintentionally hilarious (-The Room,- anyone?).

2. Impact on Creativity

Some argue that recognizing worst originals might discourage creators from taking risks or exploring unconventional ideas. If failure is only rewarded, it could potentially lead to a culture where creativity is stifled in favor of more commercially viable projects. However, this perspective overlooks the fact that every creative endeavor benefits greatly from healthy doses of constructive criticism and learning opportunities.

3. Public Perception and Viewership

It's important to consider whether there's an audience for such recognition. If viewers enjoy a poorly received show or movie (as evidenced by its viewership numbers), it might not be entirely productive to label it as -worst.- Entertainment, after all, is subjective, and what one person considers terrible, another might find delightful escapism.

4. Evolution of Content Standards

The landscape of streaming originals is still evolving, with platforms experimenting more than traditional networks that are bound by established standards. As such, content quality can be expected to improve as creators learn from past mistakes and refine their skills. However, this doesn't mean there aren't gems among the chaff during this initial phase of rapid experimentation.

5. The Role of Streaming Platforms

Platforms like Netflix have already shown a willingness to invest in high-risk projects that might not always pay off critically but could attract a devoted fanbase or become a cultural phenomenon (e.g., -Stranger Things,- despite its mixed reviews, has a massive cult following). Recognizing the worst originals could serve as a reminder of this risk/reward dynamic and how streaming platforms navigate it.

6. Educational Value

Critically assessing content-even if it's labeled as -worst--can be educational in itself. Viewers might learn to appreciate what they previously dismissed, or creators might take away valuable lessons from such recognitions that help them improve their craft.

---

4.) Conclusion: Balancing Risk and Reward

In conclusion, while there is a case for recognizing the worst streaming originals, it's essential to consider the implications on creativity, public perception, and platform strategies. A balanced approach could be to use such awards as a means of highlighting the risk-reward dynamic in content creation and providing valuable feedback loops for creators. Ultimately, whether or not to award -worst- streaming originals depends on how these factors are weighed by each platform and society at large.

---

The Autor: PixelSamurai / Takashi 2025-11-01